The question here seems to be more about egoism than ego.

Egoism is a relatively easy thing to correct, because every-one knows what it is. It is easy to discover, easy to correct, if,, one truly wants to do it and is bent on it.

But the ego is much more difficult to seize, because, fact, to realise what the ego is one must already be out of otherwise one cannot find it out. You are wholly moulded from it, from head to foot, from the outermost to the innermost, fro the physical to the spiritual, you are steeped in ego. It is mix with everything and you are not aware of what it is. You must have already conquered it, come out of it, freed yourself fro it, at least partially, at least in some little comer of your being somewhere, in order to realise what the ego is.

The ego is what helps us to individualise ourselves and what prevents us from becoming divine. It is like that. Put that together and you will find the egg. Without the ego, as the world is organised, there would be no individual, and with the ego the world cannot become divine.

It would be logical to conclude. "Well, let us first of all become conscious individuals and then we shall send away the,, ego and become divine." Only, when we have become conscious, individuals, we have grown so accustomed to living wit ego that we are no longer; able to discern it and much labour is needed to become aware of its, presence.

On the other hand, everyone knows what egoism is. you want to pull everything towards you and other people not interest you, that is called egoism; when you put yourself at the centre of the universe and all things exist only in relation to you, that is egoism. But it is very obvious, one must be blind not to see that one is egoistic. Everybody is a little egoistic, more or less, and at least a certain proportion of egoism is normally acceptable; but even in ordinary life, when one is a little too egoistic, well, one receives knocks on the nose, because, since everyone is egoistic, no one much likes egoism in others.

It is taken for granted, it is part of public morality. Yes, one must be a little bit egoistic not too much, so it is not conspicuous ! On the other hand, nobody speaks of the ego, because nobody knows it. It is such an intimate companion that one does not even recognise its existence; and yet so long as it is there one will never have the divine consciousness.

The ego is what makes one conscious of being separate from others. If there were no ego, you would not perceive that you are a person separate from others. You would have the impression that you are a small part of a whole, a very small part of a very great whole. On the other hand, every one of you is most certainly quite conscious of being a separate person. Well, it is the ego that gives you this impression. As long as you are conscious in this way, it means that you have an ego.

When you begin to be aware that everything is yourself, and that this is only a very small point in the midst of thousands and thousands of other points of the same person that you are everywhere, when you feel that you are yourself in everything and that there is no separation, then you know that you are on the way towards having no more ego. There even comes a time when it is impossible to conceive oneself and say, "It is not I", for even to express it in this way, to say that the All is you, that you are the All or that you are the Divine or that the Divine is you, proves that something still remains. There is a moment - this happens in a flash and can hardly stay - when it is the All that thinks, it is the All that knows, it is the All that feels, it is the All that lives. There is not even... not even the impression that... you have reached that point.

Then it is all right. But until then, there is still a little remnant of ego somewhere; usually it is the part, which looks on, the witness that looks on.

So do not assert that you have no more ego. It is not accurate. Say you are on the way towards having no more ego, that is the only correct thing to say.

I do hot believe that it has happened to you, has it ? - not yet! And yet it is indispensable, if you truly intend to know what the supramental is. If you are a candidate for supermanhood, you must resolve to dispense with your ego, to go beyond it, for as long as you keep it with you, the supermind will, be for you something unknown and inaccessible.

But it through effort, through discipline, through progressive mastery, you surmount your ego and go beyond it, even if only in the tiniest part of your being, this acts like the opening of a small window somewhere, and by looking carefully through the window, you will be able to glimpse the supermind. And that is a promise. When you glimpse it, you find it So beautiful that You immediately want to get rid of all the rest… of the ego!

Please note that I am not saying that You must be totally free from all ego in order to have a glimpse Of the supramental; for then that would be something almost impossible. No, to be free front ego, just a little bit somewhere, in some corner of your being, even only a little corner of the mind; if it is the mind and the vital, it is well and good, but if by chance - oh! not by chance-if by repeated efforts you entered into contact With your psychic being, then the door is wide open. Through the psychic you can suddenly have a Very clear and beautiful vision of what the supermind is, Only ; vision, not a realisation. That is the great way out. But even without going so far 4 this beautiful realisation, the psychic realisation, if you succeed in liberating some part of your mind or your vital, that makes a kind of hole in the door, a keyhole; through this keyhole you have a glimpse, just a little glimpse. And that is already very attractive and interesting.

2 May 1958